after reading what my classmates wrote, i gained much more perspective on the artists we were instructed to research. a lot of what i read i think i knew intuitively, but these are some new viewpoints and things i failed to verbalize:
crewdson's work is in part about what is possible but improbable.
he uses high contrast to emphasize his surrealist scenes.
his obviously outlandish setups have a cinematic quality achieved by working on a soundstage.
hocks's work shows his sense of humor.
he creates the feeling of atmosphere, and his works are somewhat weathered.
in his works, he portrays himself as the "everyman".
wall's work is more analytical.
he uses either random destruction or more controlled chaos.
he tries to create a feeling of "suppressed laughter" in his viewers.
sherman's work shows the artist-as-actress.
her bodily presence is the one repetitive element in her work.
she strives for a simple, "normal" appearance.